Getting women into paid employment has more impact on poverty than formalizing women's work or equalizing wage rates – findings from Latin America

International Poverty Centre (IPC) in Brazil churns out some interesting analysis and summarizes them in reader-friendly ‘one pagers’. One recent study looks at the role of gender inequality in explaining income growth, poverty and inequality. Here’s a summary of the one pager. The full paper is here. The IPC tries to answer the following question: which aspect of gender inequalities should be considered priority in the design of public policies that seek to reduce gender inequalities and poverty? In order to understand the link between poverty and gender inequalities in Latin America, the authors, Joana Costa and Elydia Silva, look closely at eight countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Mexico, Paraguay and Uruguay. Three aspects of gender inequalities in the labour market are apparent in these countries. First, women have a markedly lower rate of economic activity than men. Second, rates of female informality and unemployment are usually higher than those for men. Third, women receive lower hourly remuneration. They then used some economic wizardry (a partial equilibrium exercise) to arrive at rough estimates of what would happen if each of these three aspects was corrected while holding the other two constant. The results are summarized in the bar chart. Their conclusions? The reduction of all three aspects of gender inequalities in the labour market would help reduce poverty. The best returns come from dealing with the the comparatively low rate of economic activity among women. If female participation or the labour force increases (simulation 1), the potential reduction of the incidence of poverty would be greatest in Chile (34 per cent) and least in Uruguay (15 per cent). Second, the potential decline in poverty that could be achieved by equalizing women’s and men’s probabilities of being unemployed, formal workers or informal workers (simulation 2) would not be higher than 8 per cent.  Third, poverty declines by up to 14 per cent when female and male hourly remuneration is levelled (simulation 3). Though it is important to eliminate others aspects of gender inequalities, the researchers therefore conclude that promoting women’s participation in the labour market is the aspect with the greatest potential to promote pro-poor growth and so should be an essential element of public policies. Since caring for children increases the probability of women being economically inactive, one important means of increasing female participation might be to provide childcare facilities, especially to poor women.]]>

Subscribe to our Newsletter

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please see our .

We use MailChimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to MailChimp for processing. Learn more about MailChimp's privacy practices here.


3 Responses to “Getting women into paid employment has more impact on poverty than formalizing women's work or equalizing wage rates – findings from Latin America”
  1. I would have thought that it should be apparent intuitively that removing gender inequality in workforce would help lower poverty.
    By giving opportunity to women to join workforce, you are utilizing unused natural resources (human capital) which would in turn help increase GDP and hence increase per capita incomes.
    Having said that, I think it should also be noted that this would be the case only when the men have been fully (or nearly fully) employed. And I am not saying this because of any gender bias, but simple economics. If a woman is employed at the expense of the man of the house (simplistically speaking), the income that she would bring home would be less than that the man would have brought (remember the fact about lower wages for women?) and hence increased poverty for the household. Extend this to the nation and you will have more poverty nationally. So gender equality should be achieved by (a) increasing employment opportunities, (b) fully employing the men, and (c) making jobs available to the women.
    I may be wrong, but I would like to hazard a guess that Chile

  2. Sanjeev: You write some interesting things – Chilean women often struggle to find work that pays adequately. They do the work that a man can do, yet only get paid a mere fraction of the same wage. Sadly, there’s very little gender equality within Latin America, even to this day.