What do we know about food riots and their link to food rights? Some interesting new findings from IDS

Went off to a rain-drenched Institute of Development Studies last week for one of those great workshops where a group of country researchers come together with case studies on a similar issue and then swap ideas on what general conclusions are emerging. The topic was the rash of food riots that struck 30+ countries in the aftermath of the 2008 food price spike, marking the onset of a new

English food riots

period of volatilility with big social and economic impacts (see, for example, the Oxfam/IDS project on life in a time of food price volatility, which has its second annual report coming out soon).

The starting point for the work, which is being led by Naomi Hossain, is bringing together an IDS-style ‘voices of the rioters’ approach, using focus groups and interviews, with a more theoretical ‘moral economy’ lens, drawing on the work of EP Thompson on food riots in 18thC England (right). As Naomi and Ferdous Jahan explain in their Bangladesh study:

‘People do not protest because they are hungry, but on the basis of powerful ideological justifications that arise from ideas about how food markets should work, the limits set by public opinion on the freedoms of (food) markets in times of scarcity or crises, and the idea that public authorities are responsible to act to protect people’s rights to food at such times. These are summarised as ‘moral economy’ ideas, and may be latently present under normal conditions. But it is mainly when shocks occur in the national or local food economy that they tend to be activated and articulated and to legitimate popular mobilisation.’

Case studies on Bangladesh, India, Kenya and Mozambique threw up some important stuff. I’ll link to the papers when they are finalised and published, but here are some initial impressions.

The importance of history and memory: one legacy of horrific 20thC famines in Bangladesh and India is that both the public and policy makers are highly sensitive to the issue of food security. In Kenya, the memory of post election violence in 2008 meant that protesters were much less likely to resort to violence this time around.

food_riotThe blame game is complicated: rioters tend to blame private sector baddies (hoarders and speculators), and corrupt government officials, but demand solutions from those same governments, often contrasting today’s situation with an imaginary golden age of state responsiveness. The retreat of the state and rise of market mechanisms has had a multiple impact here – privatization, often to the hands of well connected insiders, seems to have replaced old forms of patronage (‘inclusive clientilism’?) with a more elitist version. Fewer people have their snouts in the trough these days. State retreat also weakens its ability to respond to protest.

The interplay between institutions, ‘politics as usual’ and violent protest. Where there are channels that poor people see as at least partly genuine, protests will often go that route, rather than the much riskier path of chucking Molotov cocktails. In India, protesters in Madhya Pradesh, with its vibrant Right to Food movement, were much less likely to go on the rampage than those in West Bengal, where such a movement is largely absent.

When violence does become the preferred option, what does it achieve? Mixed findings here – in the short term, a few government concessions (eg abandoning price rises), but few medium term improvements. What the research was unable to answer was the longer term impact of violent protest, for example in delegitimizing existing power holders and paving the way for new political groupings, as the anti-austerity riots in Latin America in the 1980s and 1990s arguably did.

And (of course) a few constructive whinges:

The work thus far is surprisingly weak on gender. Perhaps more than any other topic, food bridges the public and private spheres, andfood price protests is often a focus for women’s engagement outside the home. But while the leadership of peaceful civil society movements such as India’s Right to Food movement is largely female (see right), riots tend to be a young guy thing. So what happens to the gender dimension when protests turn violent? I hope there’s still time to look at that before the papers are finalised.

There seems to be a possible typology of riots emerging here:

  • Defensive (drop those price rises, now!)
  • Cathartic (I’ve had enough, I want to smash something)
  • Genuine programmatic (politics has to change)
  • Manipulated programmatic (political leader stirs up riots to pursue his agenda)

Would be good to see if that can be developed further.

Finally, for once, I started to worry if there was too much deference to history here, in particular English history. University of Tennessee historian John Bohstedt described the 18th Century riots as the ‘first draft of the welfare state’ and saw events since 2008 as an analogous process, but is that true? For example, the interviews suggest very few of the rioters describe these things as food riots – they are often triggered by something else, such as transport price hikes.  Does our progressive, but still colonial historical baggage distort our understanding of what’s going on? That’s as close to heresy as I’m prepared to go today.

Update: here’s a collection of other blogs on the food riots project, c/o Nick Benequista

Subscribe to our Newsletter

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please see our .

We use MailChimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to MailChimp for processing. Learn more about MailChimp's privacy practices here.


11 Responses to “What do we know about food riots and their link to food rights? Some interesting new findings from IDS”
  1. Naomi Hossain

    hi Duncan, thanks for this and I love the idea of the ‘voices of the rioters’. our group thinks that riots work, though, somewhat more than you do. Why? Because while they wring only short term changes from lazy or corrupt or neglectful policymakers, they also remind them that a) the masses have numbers on their side (99%, anyone?) and that b) they hold the key to the legitimacy of public authorities. Without that all the ruling classes have are their guns

      • Naomi hossain

        I think the research shows that food riots work -in some contexts mind you- and the evidence is how alert policymakers have been to the possibility of protest as food prices rise, at efforts to specifically target the food insecurities of the urban precariat and also in the beefing up of the security apparatus in places like bangladesh – the industrial police and so on. But as the India case shows, you don’t have to have riots to secure your right to food- if you have a strong grassroots based, middle class-backed civil society movement. Unfortunately, most of the rest of the developing world, Brazil apart- can only dream.

  2. Alex Kelbert

    One policymaker interviewed (was it in Mozambique?) said something like ‘We don’t want Egypt to happen here’, to explain the government’s U-turn on subsidies. For me that’s a clear sign that what you say about the importance of memory also has an impact on decisionmakers. in Mozambique for instance, I suspect they remembered the 2008 and 2010 riots, but also they understood that they weren’t immune to what was happening in other parts of the globe. So yes, I would say that riots/protests do work.

    Also, for those interested, here’s a link to a podcast of John Bohstedt’s lecture “Food Riots and Politics of Provisions in World History”: http://www.mixcloud.com/ids/food-riots-and-politics-of-provisions-in-world-history/

  3. Rob Nash

    Interesting discussion. I wonder, did anyone in the conference look at the impact of the food riots on profitability of food and agribusiness companies operating in or sourcing from those countries (or investing in)? To some extent, agriculture investors have at least until some recent moves (like those of the companies linked to the BtB campaign) seemed more concerned about the risk from social unrest related to food prices and supply than they were about more direct operational or reputational risk from issues like local land conflicts. This may be because they had better-looking proxies against which to quantify and price the political risk, but it would be interesting to see what the numbers say – especially now the likes of Munden Project have done interesting work on the financial cost (and uninsurability) of local land conflicts.

  4. John Bohstedt

    Unfortunately Duncan missed my point. I did not say food riots were the first draft of the welfare state. I said that the responses of rulers to food riots — soup kitchens and relief food shops — were the first draft of the welfare state. They were the product of the politics of provisions, the bargaining by food riot between rioters and their rulers, in a typical pattern of riots — repression — relief, in various combinations, in hundreds of food riots. Riots made agents of working people, so different from the despised objects of charity and the Poor Laws. In similar fashion, the pillars of the welfare state put in place between 1906-21 and 1945-50 were the products of both popular power wielded by the labour movement, and the state’s recognition of the people’s key part in the World Wars, and its need to recognize that in tangible fashion. The health, unemployment, etc. acts of those periods put a safety net under the people, as the soup kitchens in routine response to food riots did in the 18th century. Food riots were only a part — but a driving part — of the politics of provisions — the whole matrix of politics that required rioters and rulers to bargain.

    Do Food Riots “work?” The evidence I’ve gathered says yes — in many cases — it’s a matter of probability/ complex odds — not simple determinism. But remember rioters are risking their lives, and they are not suicidal — they are survivors!!
    Do rioters describe what they’re doing as ‘food riots’ – a kind of silly question; they don’t describe it as “collective violence” or “popular mobilization” either. – they do make clear that food is what they demand their government do something about.
    I’ve gathered a lot of evidence on both these questions — so see for yourself. The draft with my evidence on the politics of provisions is on the IDS website; Now, a year later, I’ve done a lot more work on 2008 food crisis and riots. I’d be glad to send you a draft. bohstedt@gmail.com