Why is humanitarian work so hard in cities?

Where do you start?[/caption] worker said, you can’t just go in and say ‘take me to the chief’. Even in post-earthquake Port au Prince, with many of the formal institutions in disarray, there will be all sorts of centres of power, both formal and informal: churches, gangs, community organizations etc. That places a premium on political awareness and negotiation skills, but also on understanding the longer term political implications of your relief work – what institutions will be strengthened or weakened by a particular approach to emergency relief? How do you manage the risk of local politicians trying to coopt and capitalise on your efforts for political advantage (as some will inevitably do)? 2. Fluidity. People in urban areas have more ways of surviving, often producing complex livelihoods strategies that see them busy at all hours of day and night. So much harder to organize partipatory processes – people find it harder to come to meetings etc. Plus they don’t stay put. When we tried to identify ‘beneficiaries’ in shanty towns after flooding in a previous Haitian disaster, the faces were different the next time we went back to hand out emergency relief. Everything from damage assessment to needs analysis becomes more difficult. 3. Social cohesion. Some shanty towns are less cohesive, making it much harder to work with communities that are atomised, crime ridden and lacking in trust. A-Haitian-national-police-0184. Security: in those slums that have crime problems, security jacks up the costs of operations (and slows up their speed). We’re already seeing signs of that in Haiti. 5. Not so relevant in Port au Prince, given the virtual absence of a functioning state right now, but in general there’s a tendency to think ‘Urban is for governments’: governments, both national and local, tend to be more present in (some) shanty towns, making it less clear what role exists for NGOs and raising both opposition from old hippies averse to working with the state, and concerns about setting up parallel structures that can actually undermine state provision. 6. Scale: we don’t do big infrastructure, but cities involve just that. Improving a dilapidated urban water system serving hundreds of thousands of people is very different to drilling a new borehole. 7 Space: when land is at a premium, there may be nowhere to locate evacuation sites or build the latrines or reservoirs. Conclusion? The urban world is messy; an NGO will have to work in complex alliances and relationships with other bodies, in which political as well as engineering skills will be essential. It will have to be more agile and flexible; less command-and-control. One guy at the discussion commented wryly that he’d been talking about ‘going urban’ in various NGOs since 1987, which as well as being rather depressing, suggests there are some real institutional barriers to overcome. It’s difficult, but in most of the world, it’s a big part of the future. The Haitian earthquake may be extreme, but there will be more urban disasters in the decades to come.]]>

Subscribe to our Newsletter

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please see our .

We use MailChimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to MailChimp for processing. Learn more about MailChimp's privacy practices here.


4 Responses to “Why is humanitarian work so hard in cities?”
  1. I wish to express my shock and disgust at the Obama-led American government’s behaviour in Haiti. In the face of crisis and tragedy, they have shown nothing but contempt for other countries wishing to help those who are dying in Haiti. The US has commandeered and taken over the airport at Port au Prince.Planes from other countries have been turned away by US military personnel. Even planes carrying medical equipment such as mobile hospitals, mobile operating theatres, and dialysis machines are being turned away. Planes carrying food have been turned away. This is unacceptable and shocking behaviour. I hereby publically distance myself from the Obama government, which I so strongly supported during the election campaign. I sincerely hope other concerned people wanting to help those in need, have the courage to denounce the actions of the US government.

  2. At the macro level, it’s complexity in general – we’re poor at dealing with it. Urban environments are far more complex than rural environments, and the sort of linear interventions preferred by the humanitarian community simply don’t do that well.

  3. pushpanath

    The fundemental reson is that we as Oxfam have an aversion to history(Of the organization)which sometime translates into wondefully enabling older and experienced staff to exit or ignore.
    You only have to visit the archives to find out some of the urban programme before oxfam decided on global stategic objectives.
    There was an attempt in late late 19902s to revisit the subject but nothing happened.
    The moment we talk about Urban -we worry about having an expert,having an expert knowledge and writing the most compelling paper which all the great and good have to agree…
    there you go-where are the field staff who could just go into an urban shanty and start a conversation -today?

  4. Sara

    Actually, the majority of the world’s population now reside in cities. This is a fact and the plights and perils of the poor in burgeoning cities of developing countries, like Port au Prince, are only getting worse by the day. Yes, local and some national NGOs exist, but none with the scale and capacity that Oxfam and other international NGOs can bring in terms of expertise. While rural poverty is incredibly hard, I do not know of what life could be worse than that of a youth who migrates from the fresh air and most likely better quality of life, and family in his/her rural village to an urban squalor in search of employment, opportunities, etc. and then end up living the slum life. Furthermore, he/she is too ashamed to return home for fear of being considered a failure by his/her community! But we as humanity did this because rural has been considered ‘backwards’ and all the media portrays success and the ‘good easy hifi life’ (that everyone wants) as obtainable in the city.
    Anyways, I am an urban planner and a fellow urban planner in the US has suggested creating a ‘Planners without Borders’ organization. See the link to the discussion via the Sustainable International Development group on LinkedIn. What are your thoughts on this?